IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 Before The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1447 of 2011(res) Between:
SRI. NARENDRA S. KUNDAPURKAR, S/O SRI. SHIVARAM, AGED 69 YEARS, NAVRANG HARDWARE, OPP OLD BUS STAND, MAIN ROAD, KUNADPURA – 576 201.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) And:
1. SRI. VIVEKANANDA, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O SRI. K. DAYANANDA.
2. SMT. SHARADA VIVEK, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O SRI. VIVEKANANDA.
NOs. 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT CHIKANSAL ROAD KUNDAPURA – 576 201.
(SERVED) ... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.3.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.52/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.6.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.111/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., KUNDAPURA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that he has been instructed to withdraw the appeal because the parties have been able to come to terms.
The memo is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, Misc.Cvl.No.13466/2011 does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr