IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.8769 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI.NARAYANAPPA C, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, R/A NO.22/14, 2ND MAIN ROAD, NANJUNDESWARA NAGAR, NANDINI LAYOUT POST, BENGALURU – 560096. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.SANTOSH RAJ URS, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1. SRI.LINGAPPA B, S/O BETTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
2. SMT.JAYAMMA, W/O LINGAPPA B, AGED 50 YEARS.
BOTH R/A NO.942, 5TH MAIN, VIJAYANANDA NAGARA, (DEENABANDU NAGARA), NANDINI LAYOUT POST, SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE ROAD, BENGALURU – 560096. ...RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC CALL FOR RECORDS RELATING TO O.S.NO.5844/2017 FROM THE FILE OF THE LVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-57) AT BANGALORE AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellant absent.
2. On the previous date, as per the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, three weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections and peremptory order is passed that if the office objections are not complied within such period, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal.
3. Even today, there is no representation by the counsel for the appellant.
4. In view of the office note, it is evident that, the office objections are not complied with.
5. Hence, this Miscellaneous First Appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE SJ