Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Narasimhaiah vs Sri Mudalappa

High Court Of Karnataka|08 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1386 of 2016 (EX) Between:
SRI NARASIMHAIAH SON OF SANNAGOVINDAPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT GALIHALLI VILLAGE, BIRUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT – 577 116 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJASUBRAMANYA BHAT B., ADVOCATE ) And:
SRI MUDALAPPA SON OF TIMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAREHALLI, BIRUR POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT – 577 116 ... RESPONDENT (SRI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD M.S, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.02.2016 PASSED IN RA.NO.97/2013 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHIKKAMAGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 14.08.2013 PASSED ON I.A.No.7 IN EX.No.17/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., KADUR, DISMISSING THE I.A.No.7 FILED UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 58, 59, 97 AND 98 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the parties have amicably settled the dispute. As such, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the same.
Memo is accepted, and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- Judge KPS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Narasimhaiah vs Sri Mudalappa

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 November, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad