IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6488 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
1. SRI. NAGESHAWAR RAO T S/O. LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SMT. T. BHARAMARAMBA S/O. SRI. NAGESHAWAR RAO T, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PETITIONER NO. 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.202, MARUTHI PLAZA, RAJAPANGAL ROAD, LAWYERPET, ORNGALE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, PIN-523 002. ANDHRAPRADESH 3. SRI. SURENDRA BABU THATHA S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, R/AT FLAT #16, KINGS VIEW, WEST END ROAD, HIGH WYCOMEBE-HP112PQ, UNITED KINGDOM.
AND LOCAL ADDRESS RESIDING AT NO.202, MARUTHI PLAZA, RAJAPANGAL ROAD, LAWYERPET, ORNGALE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, PIN-523 002.
ANDRAPRADESH ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: S NAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY KR PURAM POLICE, BANGALORE-560 036.
2. SMT. S. APARNA W/O. SRI. MURALI KRISHNA, D/O. SUBBARAM S, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, GAURAV NILAYA, 2ND "B" CROSS, GOKULA EXTENSION, DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA, BANGALORE-560 036.
AND ALSO PERMANENT ADDRESS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT, (MOTHERS HOUSE) SMT. S. APARNA, D/O. SUBBARAM S W/O. MURALI KRISHNA T, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OJALAHALLI VILLAGE, SOMAYAJALAHALLI POST, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 135.
AND ALSO PRESENT WORKING COMPANY ADDRESS OF THE ACCUSED, SMT. S. APARNA, D/O. SUBBARAM S, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA T, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, CAPGEMNINI BUSINESS SERVICES (INDIA) LTD., #73/1, EMPLOYEE ID NO.56554, GARUDACHARPALYA, MAHADEVAPURA POST, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 048.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 08.06.2016 IN CR.NO.322/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE K.R PURAM, POLICE JURISDICATION X ACMM, MAYOHALL, BANGLAORE, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R On 23.4.2018, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 – State made a submission that charge sheet has already been filed on 30.09.2017. In view of this submission, learned counsel for petitioners sought time to file appropriate application to challenge the charge sheet.
2. So far no application has been filed. None appears for petitioners. Hence, reserving liberty to petitioners to seek for discharge before the trial court, petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Bss