Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Nagendrappa vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD W.P.Nos.44835-44836/2015 (LB-RES) C/W W.P.Nos.44599-44600/2015 (LB-RES) W.P.Nos.44926-44927/2015 (LB-RES) W.P.Nos.44928-44929/2015 (LB-RES) & W.P.Nos.44823-44824/2015 (LB-RES) IN W.P.Nos.44835-44836/2015 BETWEEN SRI NAGENDRAPPA S/O LATE NAGASWARA SANJEEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS MODERN SHAVING SHOP SHOP NO.10/42, PAVAGADA ROAD CHALLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE CHALLAKERE MUNICIPALITY CHLLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1, SRI.R.PURUSHOTHAM, ADV.R2) W.P.Nos.44599-44600/2015 BETWEEN SMT S SHANKUNTHALA W/O.GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS ANANDA HAIR DRESSES, SHOP NO.32/64, MAHADEVI ROAD CHALLAKERE PIN-577 522.
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE CHALLAKERE MUNICIPALITY CHLLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1, SRI.R.PURUSHOTHAM, ADV.R2) W.P.Nos.44926-44927/2015 BETWEEN SRI. K. PRABHAKAR S/O.LATE. SAAKANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS VEERESHA SUPPLIERS SHOP NO.123/35, MAHADEVI ROAD CHALLAKERE PIN-577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE CHALLAKERE MUNICIPALITY CHLLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1, SRI.R.PURUSHOTHAM, ADV.R2) W.P.Nos.44928-44929/2015 BETWEEN SRI. O. THIPPESWAMY S/O OBALAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RAGHAVENDRA TEXTILES SHOP NO.30/62, PAVAGADA ROAD CHALLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE CHALLAKERE MUNICIPALITY CHLLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1, SRI.R.PURUSHOTHAM, ADV.R2) W.P.Nos.44823-44824/2015 BETWEEN SRI MALLIKARJUNA S/O.LATE CHINNA VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS TIP TOP HAIR DRESSERS SHOP NO.4/36, PAVAGADA ROAD CHALLAKERE PIN-577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE CHALLAKERE MUNICIPALITY CHLLAKERE PIN -577 522 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANANDEESHWARA, HCGP. FOR R1, SRI.R.PURUSHOTHAM, ADV.R2) *** THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-2 DATED.15.9.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. AND QUASH THE CIRCULAR DATED.14.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-1 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE EXISTING TENANTS CONTINUING THE POSSESSION OF THE COMMERCIAL PREMISES AT CATEGORY[3] OF THE NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX-B.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING “B” GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R In these writ petitions, the petitioners are questioning the notice dated 15.9.2015 issued by the respondent No.2 vide Annexure-A.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondent No.2 has initiated proceedings under the provisions of the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1974. Therefore, these writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petitions will not survive for consideration.
4. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE DM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Nagendrappa vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad