IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.42676/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. NAGARAJAPPA S/O LATE AJAPPARA HALAPA AGED ABOTU 54 YEARS 2. SMT RENUKAMMA W/O ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SRI RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE AJAPPARA HALAPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR S/O LATE AJAPPARA HALAPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 5. SMT NEELAMMA W/O LATE PATHA NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. SMT MANJULA W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 7. SRI HARISHA W/O LATE PATHA NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 8. SRI GIRISHA W/O LATE PATHA NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURISTS & R/AT NITTUVALLI KASABA HOBLI, TQ AND DIST DAVANAGERE ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI JAGADEESHGOUDA PATIL, ADVOCATE] AND:
1. SMT. GIRIJAMMA W/O LATE A HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. MALLIKARJUNA S/O LATE A HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 3. VINAYAKA S/O LATE A HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R-1 TO R-3 ARE R/O C/O SRIGANDA LODGE P B ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577002 4. THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DAVANAGERE - 577512 5. THE COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE HARIHARA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DAVANAGERE DIST - 577001 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAITHARA BHAVANA DAVANAGERE DIST - 577001 7. THE CHIEF SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI SANTOSH S GOGI AND SRI SHIVAKUMAR GOGI, ADVOCATES FOR R1 TO R3 SMT.NALINI VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-5 R4 AND R6 ARE SERVED, BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE COURT AT DAVANAGERE ON I.A.12 U/O XI RULE 14 OF CPC IN O.S.92/2011 AT ANNEX-G AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE I.A.NO.12 U/O XI RULE - 14 OF CPC AT ANNEX-E AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 14.07.2016 on I.A.No.12 in O.S.No.92/2011 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.92/2011 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
PMR Sd/- JUDGE