IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.F.A. No.385/2014 BETWEEN :
SRI N.L.RAMA RAO S/O LATE LAXMINARASIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT TYPE 3, BLOCK NO.30, NO.423, CPWD QUARTERS, HSR LAYOUT I SECTOR, AGARA POST BANGALORE-560034 REP. BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ASHOK KUMAR ...APPELLANT (BY SRI D.C.DEEPAK, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND :
SRI K.R.THIMMARAYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS OLD NO.360, NEW NO.84 5TH CROSS, K.R.LAYOUT PUTTENAHALLI MAIN ROAD J P NAGAR, 6TH PHASE BANGALORE-560078 …RESPONDENT THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.11.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6624/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE V-ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
- 2 -
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent.
For the reason that the appellant’s counsel has failed to comply the office objections, appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- JUDGE AN/-