IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR WRIT PETITION No.46262/2017 (HRC RES) BETWEEN SRI. N.B.MABEN, S/O LATE SADRAK MABEN, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O NO.8-78 A(1), ISHWARANAGAR, NO.78, HERGA VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.A.DEVANAND, ADVOCATE) AND SMT. RAJASHREE.B.NAYAK, W/O LATE K.B.NAYAK, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O SHENAY HOUSE, PARKALA, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576101. ... RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT TO SET- ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN H.R.C NO.1/2003 BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE [JR.DN] UDUPI. DTD:28.2.2009 AND THAT OF THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN RENT REVISION PETITION NO.8/2009 DTD:12.8.2017, BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE UDUPI, WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D & G BY ALLOWING THE W.P.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR ‘ORDERS’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Office has raised objections regarding maintainability of the writ petition against Annexure-G to the writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo praying leave of this court to convert the writ petition into revision petition.
3. Memo is taken on record and ordered accordingly.
The writ petition stands disposed off for statistical purpose.
CT-HR Chs* Sd/- JUDGE