Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Mustafa Abdullah And Others vs Karnataka Board Of Wakf " Darul And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|21 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.49260-261 OF 2013 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MUSTAFA ABDULLAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O SRI ABDULLAH IDINABHA MELANGADI, ULLAL, P.O. ULLAL MANGALORE TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA.
2. SRI. FAROOQ ULLAL AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O SRI. H. ABDUL KHADER 9-58/B, MELANGADI, NEAR ULLAL DARGA ULLAL 575020, MANGALORE TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA.
… PETITIONERS (By Mr. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADV., (ABSENT)) AND:
1. KARNATAKA BOARD OF WAKF "DARUL AUKHARF" NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE 560052 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
2. CHAIRMAN/WAKF OFFICER DISTRICT WAKF/COMMITTEE D.K, MANGALORE-574159.
3. ULLAL JUMMA MASJID (402) AND SAYYED MADANI DARGAH COMMITTEE ULLAL, MANGALORE TALUK-574159 REP. BY ITS VICE-PRESIDENT.
4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K. DISTRICT MANGALORE-574159.
5. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE D.K. DISTRICT MANGALORE.
… RESPONDENTS (By Smt. S.R. ANURADHA, ADV., FOR R1 & R2 (ABSENT) Smt. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R4 & R5 Mr. B.A. TURKI, ADV., FOR Mr. NAVEED AHMED, ADV., FOR R3) - - -
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES & 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DT.15.10.13, ENCLOSED HEREWITH AS ANN-A, FOLLOWED BY THE ORDER DT.24.10.13, ENCLOSED HEREWITH AS ANN-B, BOTH PASSED BY THE R1 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None for the petitioners.
Sri.B.A.Turki, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
Smt.Niloufer Akbar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.4 and 5.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 25.02.2019. Therefore, a Bench of this Court had adjourned the case finally for a period of one week. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the writ petitions.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Mustafa Abdullah And Others vs Karnataka Board Of Wakf " Darul And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
21 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe