IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.30792/2015 (LR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI MUNIREDDY S/O.LATE THAMAIAH @ GURAPPA AGED 55 YEARS R/AT VADERAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 064.
RERPESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI GANESH REDDY S/O.H.M. PRAKASH REDDY AGED 35 YEARS R/AT NO.13, JALARENUKA H. MUNIREDDY MAIN ROAD HMR LAYOUT, POORNAPURA BANGALORE 560 054.
(BY SRI SANKET M. YENAGI, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE-560 001 ... PETITIONER RERESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 3. SHRI GURUPPACHARI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS A) SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE GURAPPACHARI AGED 45 YEARS B) SHRI SHANKARACHARI S/O. LATE GURAPPACHARI AGED 40 YEARS C) SMT. ARATHI D/O. LATE GURAPPACHARI AGED 32 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.3(A) TO 3(C) ARE R/AT NO.26, 20TH CROSS MAGADI ROAD, MARIYAPPANAPALYA BANGALORE 560 023.
4. SHRI H. VENKATACHARI S/O. HANUMANTHACHARI CHIKKABANAVARA VILLAGE YESWANTHAPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-583 124.
5. SMT. PADMAMMA W/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED 50 YEARS 6. SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED 45 YEARS 7. SHRI LOKESH S/O. LATE CHINNAPPA AGED 38 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 7 ARE R/AT VADERAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK BANGALORE-560 064.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.S.BUDIHAL, H.C.G.P. FOR R.1 & R.2; SRI B.V. GANGIREDDY, ADV. FOR R3(B);
SRI K.M. THIRTHAPPA, ADV. FOR R3(A) & (C); SRI C.M.DESAI, ADV. FOR C/R4 & SRI T.N. VISHWANATHA, ADV. FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.9.6.2015 PASSED IN LRF NO.58/1974-75 PASSED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-K.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 31.01.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
The memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2016 does not survive for consideration.
Sd/- JUDGE ST