IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.27274/2018 (GM – KEB) BETWEEN:
SRI. MIR HABIBULLAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O MIR AHMED R/AT: No.108, SUBHAS NAGAR 4TH MAIN EAST OF BANGALORE-MYSORE ROAD MYSORE – 570 001 PROP OF: M/S. SUNRISE ICE FACTORY No.118, BELAGOLA INDUSTRIAL AREA METAGALLI, MYSORE – 570 001 [BY SRI B.S. NAGARAJ, ADV.] AND:
... PETITIONER 1 . THE CHIEF ENGINEER BESCOM WEST OF CHORD ROAD RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 016.
2 . THE CHIEF ENGINEER & THE PRESIDENT CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM CESCOM, MYSORE – 570 001.
3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (VIGILANCE) K.P.T.C.L. No.520, 5TH FLOOR CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU – 560 009 4. THE SUPERINDENT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) CESCOM JODI BASAVESWARA ROAD MYSURU – 570 012 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) CESCOM V.V. MOHALLA MYSORE – 570 012 6. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) CESCOM V.V. MOHALLA MYSORE – 570 012 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI. G.C. SHANMUKHA, ADV.] THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 TO 6, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RESPECTIVELY, TO CONSIDER ORDER PASSED BY THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.26661/2013, DTD 06.01.2015 VIDE ANNX-M AND PROPOSAL OF THE R-5 EXECTUIVE ENGINEER DTD 14.03.2017, IN FOR MAKING PAYMENT VIDE ANNX-Q ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent Nos.4 to 6 to consider the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26661/2013 dated 06.01.2015 for making payment to the petitioner towards the refund of the back billing charges.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.26661/2013 has been duly complied with during the pendency of the contempt proceedings initiated by the petitioner in CCC No.1945/2018. The said contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging the disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No.26661/2013 has been disposed of recording the compliance and accordingly the contempt proceedings were dropped. Hence, the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Copy of the order passed in CCC No.1945/2018 (D.D. 06.03.2019) is placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR