IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2430 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI. MAHADEVAIAH SON OF LATE VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAGANURU GATE, KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARAYANA V S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SRI. PUTTASWAMY SON OF CHANDRASHEKARAPPA, RESIDING AT MAGANURU GATE, KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.01.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 19/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MALAVALLI, REJECTING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2014 PASSED IN OS.
NO. 38/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MALAVALLI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 27.08.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE