IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NOs.17589 TO 17599 OF 2017 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN 1. SRI M. THANGAMANI S/O LATE M.MAHALINGAM AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16 MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 2. T. RAJALAKSHMI W/O M. THANGAMANI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16 MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 3. SMT. KOTTAMA W/O LATE MALA KONDAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.1, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 4. V.S.PRADEEP KUMAR S/O LATE SADASHIVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.6 MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 5. K. CHANNAKESHAVALU S/O K.RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12 MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 6. MAHESHWARA Y S/O ESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.13 MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 7. Y. RAMALINGESHWARA S/O ESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.13, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 8. MOHAMMED ASHFAQ S/O AZEEZ UR RAHMAN AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/A NO.2, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 9. SRINIVAS NARAHARI S/O N HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A NO.13, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 10. RAGHUNATHA REDDY S/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/A NO.18, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 11. SMT. USHA W/O RAGUNATH REDDY N R AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.18, MANJUNATHA LAYOUT OPPOSITE TO BUS STAND SEEGEHALLI, K R PURAM BENGALURU-560 049 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI Y.R.SADASIVA REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI DEEPAK.J, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT BENGALURU-560 001 2. TAHASILDHAR K R PURAM, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560 036. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08.01.2016 BY RESPONDENT No.2 VIDE ANNEXURE ‘P’ AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER DATED 08.01.2016 BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-P.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to pursue their remedies as available in law.
SD/- JUDGE sma