IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.38912 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. M SUBBARAMAIAH S/O LATE MILLAPPA @ MUNINANJAPPA AlGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/A GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, BAGALUR POST JALAHOBLI BENGALURU-562149.
(BY MR. RAHUL S REDDY, ADV) AND:
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENSE REP BY ITS SECRETARY NEW DELHI-110001.
2. THE DEFENSE ESTATE OFFICER GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENSE KAMARAJA ROAD, BENGALURU-560042.
3. THE AIRFORCE OFFICER IN CHIEF AIRFORCE STATION YELAHANKA BENGALURU-560063.
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT MULTI STORIED BUILDING, ... PETITIONER DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.
5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD, BENGALURU-560009.
(BY MR.Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R4 AND R5 UNNIKRISHNAN M, CGSC FOR R1 TO R3) - - -
...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 15.02.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND 09.03.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE- F GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Rahul S.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr.Unnikrishnan.M., learned Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 15.02.2018 contained in Annexure D and 09.03.2018 contained in Annexure-F submitted by the petitioner.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation submitted by him shall be considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representations submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits. Till the representations are decided, ad-interim order granted by a bench of this Court dated 03.09.2018 to continue.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS