IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.6491 OF 2019 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. M. SHETTAPPA S/O TELIMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT HUSKUR VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SHRI. M. RAGHAVENDRA ACHAR, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. P.R. JAGADEESHA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 003 2. THE TAHASILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 021 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI. Y.D. HARSHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED IN RRT/CR/NO.4/97-98 BY SAK/RRT/CR.510/2018-19 ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARIOR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Shri M. Raghavendra Achar, learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 31.10.2019 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo reads as follows:
“The Petitioner in the above writ Petition has challenged R.R.T. but, the facts was not incorporated in the above Writ Petition. It requires much more amendments to be stated. Instead of making amendment to the main petition, the Petitioner seeks leave this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh W.P.” (sic) 3. In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE AV