IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A.NO.11183 OF 2012 (MC) BETWEEN:
SRI M.R.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE M.A.RAJAGOPAL, R/AT ANNAPURNESHWARI KRUPA, OPP. TO KADIRAPPANAKUNTE, VIDYANAGAR, DODDABALLAPURA TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
(BY SRI A.N.GANGADHARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT.M.G.A RADHA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O M.R.SHIVAKUMAR, R/AT NO.1649/8649, MAIN ROAD, OPP. TO SUDHA STORE, DODDABALLAPURA TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
(BY SRI K.V.LAKSHMANACHAR, ADVOCATE) **** …APPELLANT …RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 29.09.2012 PASSED IN M.C.NO.13/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, DODDABALLAPUR, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(IA)(IB) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent submit that a joint memo has been filed bringing to the notice of this Court the fact that the parties have settled the dispute between them and therefore, the appellant has not wished to prosecute this appeal.
2. Copy of the joint memo, which is filed, is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record.
5. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE BSR