IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.2443/2017 (LA- BDA) BETWEEN:
SRI. M. MURTHAIAH S/O SRI. VENKATAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HIS G P A HOLDER SRI. M. JAGADISH S/O MUNILAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT GANIGARA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK – 560 064 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. BHADRINATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVARAMA A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE – 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, K P WEST BANGALORE – 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE – 560 020 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION PROPERTY PURSUANT TO PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 07.11.2002 ISSUED U/S 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 09.09.2003 ISSUED U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT ISSUED BY R-1 COPIES OF WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE – H AND J ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 AND 25 OF ACT 30/2013 OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the 2nd respondent – B.D.A. Bangalore Development Authority).
2. His submission is placed on record.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the B.D.A, if so advised.
Sd/- JUDGE Bsv