Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri M Govindappa And Others vs Sri Narayanaswamy And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|18 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.41807/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SRI M GOVINDAPPA SON OF SRI MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SRI MUNISHAMAPPA SON OF LATE SRI NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT DODDARALAGERE VILLAGE, SULEBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN – 562 114 ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI BALAKRISHNA A., ADV.] AND:
SRI THIMMARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1. SRI NARAYANASWAMY, SON OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI T D VENKATESH SON OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA , AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. SRI CHANDRAIAH SON OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4. SRI MUNITHIMMAPPA SON OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. SMT LAKSHMAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, WIFE OF SRI RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 6. SMT BHAGYAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT THAMMARASANAHALLI VILLAGE, SULEBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562114 …RESPONDENTS [R-1 TO R-6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 18.07.2016 PASSED ON I.A. No.11 IN O.S.NO. 1408 OF 2004, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-D, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION WITH COSTS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 18.07.2016 on I.A.No.11 in O.S.No.1408/2004 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.1408/2004 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
PMR Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri M Govindappa And Others vs Sri Narayanaswamy And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
18 February, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha