Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri M Goutham @ Sidhartha vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|21 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 3261/2019 BETWEEN SRI. M.GOUTHAM @ SIDHARTHA S/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.115 KRISHNANANDA NAGARA CHIKKAGOLLARAHATTI, PIPELINE BENGALURU – 560 027 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHISHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAGADI ROAD POLICE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HONNAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.217/2018 REGISTERED BY MAGADI ROAD POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 143, 147, 148, 448, 307, 302 AND 120(B) R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The Order Sheet discloses that, on 18.10.2019, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, on that day, as a last chance, the case was adjourned to 21.10.2019 with an observation, on that day, if the petitioner’s counsel does not appear and assist the Court for disposal of the petition, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Even today ie., on 21.10.2019, the matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present. There is no representation on their behalf. It appears, the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri M Goutham @ Sidhartha vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
21 October, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra