Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri M C Madhukumar vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH W.P.No.58047 OF 2016 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN:
Sri.M.C.Madhukumar S/o M.K.Chandru Aged about 39 years Five Layer Lotus Parlour Housing Board – II Stage, Near Mathru Shree Kalyanamantapa Kuvempunagara, Hassan – 573201.
…Petitioner (By Sri. M.N.Umashankar, Advocate (Absent)) AND:
1. State of Karnataka Department of Revenue Represented by its Secretary M.S.Building, Vidhana Veedhi, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Deputy Commissioner Mudigere Taluk, Mudigere – 577132 Chikkamagaluru District.
3. The Thasildar Mudigere Taluk, Mudigere-577132.
...Respondents (By Sri. T.S. Mahantesh, AGA (Absent)) This W.P. is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to regularize the unauthorized occupation of the petitioner in respect of land measuring 3 acres of land in Sy.No.7 of Mudigere village, Kasaba Hobli, Mudigere taluk, pursuant to the application dated 15.06.1995 vide Annex-A.
This W.P. coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER The plea of the petitioner is for consideration of his application dated 15.06.1995 vide Annexure-A. Since there has been a long lapse of time, it is just and appropriate to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the same in accordance with law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. The respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation dated 15.06.1995 vide Annexure-A and pass appropriate orders therein in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, provided the same is within time, authentic and contains all the relevant documents.
3. Petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the land in question, if not already dispossessed till such application is considered and disposed off by the respondent No.3.
SD/- JUDGE Srl.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri M C Madhukumar vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 March, 2017
Judges
  • Ravi Malimath