IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.No.1668/2016 (MV) BETWEEN :
SRI M.B.MEHABOOB SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROP: S.R.M.S.
VARDHI MOHALLA, MOLAKALMURU, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI PUTTIGE R. RAMESH, ADV.) AND :
1. THE SECRETARY ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FOR TRANSPORT, KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, 1ST FLOOR, T.T.M.C.COMPLEX, A BLOCK, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027.
2. THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 1ST FLOOR, T.T.M.C.COMPLEX, A BLOCK, K.H.ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027.
3. THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADV. FOR R-3.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN R.P.NO.289/2015 DATED 30.11.2015 IN ALLOWING THE REVISION PETITION AND SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DATED 22.04.2015 FOR THE ROUTE CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TO BELLARY & BACK VIDE ANNEXURE-P.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The petitioner has challenged the order of the Tribunal dated 30.11.2015 in R.P.No.289/2015 at Annexure-P to the writ petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit ad-idem that the subject matter of this writ petition is similar to the one considered in W.P.No.23907/2018 (MV), disposed of by this Court vide order dated 19.07.2018, whereby this Court directed the Regional Transport Authority to consider the renewal application of the petitioner in the light of the notification dated 28.09.2017.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Rule itself having been amended vide Notification dated 27.07.2018, the case of the petitioner is strengthened. This assertion is not disputed by the learned counsel for the other side.
4. It is further submitted that by the Notification dated 07.03.2019, a new Comprehensive Area Scheme for the entire State of Karnataka has been issued by the Government of Karnataka in terms of sub-section (3) of Section 100 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 whereby the existing permits with the trips and vehicles to whom permits are granted and issued by transport authorities, in operation as on 18.12.2014, and also pending renewal to operate their services on inter-State, intra-State, inter- district and intra-district routes notwithstanding anything contained in any of the approved schemes as well as the existing permits in operation with trips and vehicles of the private stage carriage operators, who are operating on non monopoly routes/area as on 24.03.2018 and the existing permits in operation according to notification dated 28.09.2017 issued by the Government of Karnataka subject to decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka are saved. The said Notification also supports the case of the petitioner.
5. For the aforegoing reasons, this writ petition stands disposed of setting aside the impugned order dated 30.11.2015 at Annexure-P. The proceedings are restored to the file of respondent No.2 – Karnataka State Transport Authority, Bengaluru, to consider the petitioner’s application for renewal of stage carriage permit in accordance with law.
6. Respondent No.2 shall conduct joint survey of the routes in question and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned, in an expedite manner, in any event, not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. All the rights and contentions of the parties are left open including the jurisdictional issue if any.
The petitioner is permitted to operate the services till a decision is taken by the Regional Authority.
Sd/- JUDGE Dvr: