IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1199/2012 BETWEEN:
SRI LAXMISHA SHETTY, S/O JAYARAM SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT BAIKAMPADY GUTTU, BAIKAMPADY POST, MANGALORE. … APPELLANT (BY SMT HALEEMA AMEEN ADV., FOR SRI S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ADV., FOR APPELLANT) AND:
SRI B NARENDRA PAI, S/O LATE B BHASKAR PAI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT 1ST FLOOR SAPNA MANSION, OPP. GOKUL HALL, ASHOK NAGAR, URWA STORE, MANGALORE.
... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2012 PASSED BY THE J.M.F.C., V COURT, MANGALORE IN C.C.NO.1289/2010 (P.C.NO.1754/2009)-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The matter pertains to the year 2012 & filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Though sufficient time is granted, process fee and correct present address of the respondent is not furnished. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE PKS