IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition No.38304 of 2017(EDN-EX) Between:
Sri.Lakshmivenkateshwara Pvt. ITI, Kuduru, Magadi Main Road, Ramanagara District – 561 101.
Represented by its Secretary Sri.K.R.Chandrashekhar Rao S/o K.H.Kandoji Rao Aged about 35 years.
(By Sri.Somashekharaiah.R.P, Advocate) And:
…Petitioner 1. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Employment & Training, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Commissioner, Department of Employment & Training, Koushalya Bhavan, Dairy Circle, Bhanerghatta Road, Bengaluru -560 029.
3. The Additional Director, Department of Employment & Training, Koushalya Bhavan, Dairy Circle, Bhanerghatta Road, Bengaluru -560 029.
4. The Joint Director, Divisional Office, Department of Employment & Training, Koushalya Bhavan, Dairy Circle, Bhanerghatta Road, Bengaluru -560 029.
5. The Joint Director, (Exam) Department of Employment & Training, Koushalya Bhavan, Dairy Circle, Bhanerghatta Road, Bengaluru -560 029.
6. The Principal, Examination Centre, Government Industrial Training Institute, Ramanagara.
7. The Deputy Director of Public Instruction, Education Department, Ramanagara.
...Respondents (By Smt.Pramodini Kishan, AGA for respondents) This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner institution to pay examination fee for the students who are studying in the petitioner institution for the period 2015-2017 for 2 years ITI course as per the report submitted by the respondents at Annexure-C to the examination to be schedule to be held in the month of August 2017 for the academic year 2015-2017 scheduled to be held on 28.8.2017 for electrician and fitter and etc.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, as relief sought for by the petitioner herein has already been granted by the respondent-Authorities.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
In the circumstances, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-