Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Lakshman K Suvarna And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|09 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.24537 OF 2017 (GM-RES) PIL BETWEEN:
1. SRI.LAKSHMAN K.SUVARNA S/O LATE KARIYA KOTIAN AGE: 57 YEARS R/A SAJANA NIVAS YERMAL BADA, POST PADU UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 574 119 2. SRI.DINESH YERMAL S/O C.M.PUTHRAN AGE: 44 YEARS R/A K.C.NILAYA YERMAL BADA, POST PADU UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 574 119 3. SRI.LAKSHMAN THINGALAYA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA K.SUVARNA AGE: 57 YEARS R/A SREE MAHALAKSHMI YERMAL BADA, POST PADU UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 574 119 ... PETITIONERS (BY SMT.HALEEMA AMEEN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.VISHWAJITH SHETTY S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS) UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI – 576 101 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA DIVISION UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 101 4. TAHASILDAR UDUPI TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 101 5. BADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH BADA VILLAGE AND POST UDUPI TALUK AND UDUPI DISTRICT – 574 119 REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 6. GENERAL SECRETARY YERMAL BADA MOGAVEERA SABHA YERMAL BADA, YERMAL PADU POST UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 574 119 7. THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR KARNATAKA DALITHA SANGARSHA SAMITHI (REGD), (AMBEDKAR VADA) DISTRICT SAMITHI UDUPI – 574 119 ... RESPONDENTS (SRI.VIVEK HOLLA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 TO R4) - - -
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order Annexure-A dated 4.4.2016 made by the R2, and etc., This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, THE CHIEF JUSTICE made the following:
ORDER A memorandum has been filed seeking leave to withdraw the writ appeal.
2. As prayed for, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. There will be no order as to costs.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Lakshman K Suvarna And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 October, 2017
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar
  • Subhro Kamal Mukherjee