IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.12327 OF 2018 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SRI L SRINIVAS S/O LATE SRI LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/A NO.32/21, 2ND MAIN ROAD MUNEERAPPA GARDEN MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD BELLANDUR BENGALURU-560103 (BY SRI.C.R.GOPALASWAMY, ADV.) AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF POLICE HAL SUB DIVISION BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560038 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER BELLANDUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560102 4. MR SIMON VICTOR CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & STATION HOUSE OFFICER BELLANDUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560102 5. MR BASAVARAJ SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE BELLANDUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU-560102 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIJAY KUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R-3; V/O DATED:05.06.2018 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R-4 AND R-5 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE THE PETITIONER’S NAME I.E. MR.L.SRINIVAS FROM THE ROWDY SHEET OF BENGALURU CITY AS PER ENFORSEMENT DATED:28.02.2018 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondents to remove the petitioner’s name from the rowdy sheet of Bengaluru city as per endorsement dated 28.02.2018 issued by the fifth respondent vide Annexure-H.
2. On perusal of the records, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner that in case a representation is made by him to the competent authority with regard to his grievance within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order passed today, the same shall be dealt with by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. Ordered accordingly.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-