IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.14632/2018 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI L.R. BASAVARAJ S/O. LATE L.B. RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SURESH BABU B.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. L.R. GAYITHRI W/O. P.N. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT PILLENAHALLI VILLAGE, KADUR TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 168.
2. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O. LATE I.B. RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA, LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168.
3. SRI L.R. LOKESH S/O. LATE I.B. RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SINCE MENTALLY RETARDED REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND RESPONDENT NO.2 RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA, LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168.
4. L.R. MANJULA D/O. LATE I.B. RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SINCE MENTALLY RETARDED REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT FRIEND RESPONDENT NO.2 RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA, LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168.
5. SRI I.R. JAYANNA S/O. LATE L.B. RUDREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA, LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168.
6. SRI GOWREGOWDA S/O. LATE BASAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT HOSA LAKYA, LAKYA POST, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK – 577 168. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.G. BHAGAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2; R-3 TO R- 5 – SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT CHIKKAMAGALURU PASSED IN O.S.NO.67/2015 BY DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.13 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 28/02/2018 on I.A.No.13 in O.S.No.67/2015 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge & CJM at Chikkamagaluru ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.67/2015 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*