IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT M.F.A.NO.5812 OF 2015 (MV) BETWEEN:
SRI.L.N.RENUKAPPA, S/O NANJUNDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT LAKKEHALLI VILLAGE, BALAGATTA POST,BAGUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATTANA TALUK.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI JAGADEESH H.T., ADVOCATE) (ABSENT) AND:
SRI.ISRAR KHAN, S/O AMEER KHAN, A1 FURNITURES, SANTHPETE, VALLABAI ROAD,HASSAN – 573 201.
... RESPONDENT *** THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.11.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.59/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, AT CHANNARAYAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT This Court on 21.03.2018 granted one week time to furnish process fee, correct address, etc. for issue of notice to respondent. The same was not done and the matter was listed on 25.01.2019. Again, a weeks’ time was granted to take steps. As the appellant failed to take steps, again, the appeal was listed on 15.04.2019. On that day, finally two weeks time was granted to take steps for service of notice in respect of respondent No.1. Again the appellant failed to take steps. Hence, the appeal is listed today for taking steps in respect of unserved respondent.
2. There is no representation for the appellant in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session.
3. Appeal stands dismissed for not taking steps for service of notice on the respondent.
Sd/- JUDGE VK