IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2308 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI KUMARAPPA SON OF BYRAPPA AGE 43 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF KENKERE VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 557.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. SWAMYNATHAN. R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SRI SHEKARAPPA SON OF AJJIRANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF MALLASINGENAHALLI VILLAGE, TALYA HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 526.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.A.C. BALARAJ., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.09.2017 PASSED IN RA. N. 235/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSADURA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JDUGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.01.2015 PASSED IN OS. NO. 215/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSADURA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 14.10.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks’ time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
nv Ct:sr SD/- JUDGE