IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.5049 OF 2016 (GM-FC) C/w WRIT PETITION NO.12006 OF 2016 In W.P.No.5049/2016 BETWEEN:
Sri. Kumar. K S/o Erappa Aged about 35 years, R/at, No.19, Rashmi Nilaya, Near Ravi Stores, Kenchenahalli, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 098.
(By Sri. N. V. Prakash, Advocate) AND:
Smt. Komal K.P W/o Kumar, D/o Prahallad, Aged about 26 years, No.485, 3rd ‘C’ Main Road, 1st Stage, II Phase, Manjunath Nagar, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010.
(By Smt. Lalitha A, Advocate) … Petitioner … Respondent This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 11.09.2015 passed on I.A. filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for payment of interim maintenance amount in M.C.No.1638/2014 on the file of Hon’ble First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru at Annexure - F and etc.
In W.P.No.12006/2016 BETWEEN:
Smt. Komal K.P W/o Kumar K, D/o Prahallad, Aged about 28 years, (Home maker) No.485, 3rd ‘C’ Main Road, 1st Stage, II Phase, Manjunath Nagar, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru – 560 010.
(By Smt. Lalitha A, Advocate) AND:
Sri. Kumar. K S/o Erappa Aged about 35 years, Occupation–Assistant Engineer (KPTCL) R/at, No.19, Rashmi Nilaya, Near Ravi Stores, Kenchenahalli, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bengaluru – 560 098.
(By Sri. C.R. Venkatesh, Advocate) … Petitioner … Respondent This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the impugned order passed in M.C.No.1638/2014, by the Hon’ble I Additional Family Judge, at Bengaluru, dated 11.09.2015, Annexure-E, an interim maintenance of only `15,000/- which is on the lower side and contrary to the authorities holding the field.
These Petitions coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDERS In W.P.No.5049/2016 Sri. N. V. Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Smt. Lalitha A, learned counsel for the respondent.
In W.P.No.12006/2016 Smt. Lalitha A, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. C.R. Venkatesh, learned counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.5049/2016 has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that dispute between the parties have been amicably settled. Memo is taken on record.
In view of the above, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-