IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.2220 OF 2017 (CS-RES) Between:
1. Sri. Krishnamurthy Subramnayam S/o Late Subramanyam Aged about 67 years R/at Flat No. 203 Shashikiran Apartments No. 9, 18th Cross Malleshwaram Bangalore – 560 055 2. Smt. Rita Agarwal W/o Sri Ajit Agarwal Aged about 50 years 210 Sashikiran Apartments No.9, 18th Cross Malleshwaram Bangalore – 560055 3. Dr. Geetha Krishnamurthy W/o Krishnamurthy Subramnayam Aged about 64 years R/at Flat No. 204 Shashikiran Apartments No.9, 18th Cross Malleshwaram Bangalore – 560 055. ... Appellants (By Sri. Laxmikanth K.B., Advocate) And:
1. The Samyukta Bharath Housing Co-operative Society Ltd.
Flat No. 003, Shashikiran Apartments No.9, 18th Cross, Malleshwaram Bangalore – 560 055 Rep. by its Chairman 2. The State of Karnataka Department of Co-operation Vidhana Soudha Bangalore 560 001 Rep. by its Secretary 3. The Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies No.1 Ali Askar Road Bangalore 560 001 4. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Pampa Mahakavi Road Chamarajpet Bangalore 560 018 ... Respondents (Sri.V.Sreenidhi, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4) ---
This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in Writ Petition No.7923/17 dated 28/2/17.
This appeal coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Chief Justice delivered the following:
days.
JUDGMENT The appeal is barred by limitation. The delay is of 7 2. As prayed for by the learned advocate for the appellants, the appeal is taken up for preliminary hearing.
3. This is an appeal against the interim order passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge.
4. We are not inclined to interfere against such interim order, when His Lordship was of the opinion that for the aid of the main relief, an interim protection is needed.
5. The application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is, also, dismissed.
6. However, we take this opportunity to request the Hon’ble Single Judge to dispose of the writ petition, as expeditiously as possible, subject to His Lordship’s convenience.
7. We make no order as to costs.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE AHB