IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.53530 OF 2017 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
SRI. KRISHNA TRADERS # 2, 1ST CROSS, SEETHAIAH BUILDING, GAJALADINNE MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, BEML LAYOUT, KOLAR-563 101 REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR:
SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. … PETITIONER (By MR.H S SANTHOSH , ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101.
3. MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL REPRESENTED BY THE PRICNIPAL, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101.
4. KITTHUR RANI CHENNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101. … RESPONDENTS (By MR. VIJAY KUMAR A PATIL, AGA FOR R1 & R2 R3 & R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO TAKE IMMEDITE ACTION IN PURSUANCE TO THE REPRESENTATION DATED 3.8.2017 AT ANNEX-C BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.H.S.Santhosh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.Vijay Kumar A.Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondent No.1 to take immediate action in pursuance to the representation dated 3.8.2017 Annexure-C by considering the representation.
4. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order and time bound manner.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and in the facts of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order within three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits.
Sd/- JUDGE RV