Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Kitty @ Krishne Gowda vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|28 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.9546 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
Sri Kitty @ Krishne Gowda S/o Thimme Gowda Aged about 28 years R/at No.302, Building No.1 Priyadarshini Shirke Apartment Kengeri Satellite Town Bangalore-560 079 Permanent Address Koppa, Maddur Taluk Mandya District (By Sri.Harish Kumar, H.C., Advocate) AND:
1. State of Karnataka By Bidadi P.S.
Rep. by SPP High Court of Karnataka Bangalore-560 010 2. Sri.K.N.Yugesh Kumar S/o K.N.Nagaraj Aged about 28 years R/o Kumbalagodu Village Mysore Road, Kengeri Hobli Bangalore South Taluk- 560 079 (By Sri.S.Chandrashekaraiah, HCGP) …Petitioner …Respondents This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to quash the entire proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.2 in C.C.No.2457/2012 (CR.No.156/2011) of respondent Bidadi Police Station, Bengaluru Rural which is registered against the petitioner/accused no.2 for the offence P/U/S/ 143, 147, 148, 114 and 307 R/w 149 of IPC which is pending before the II Addl. C.J.M., Bengaluru in C.C.No.2457/2012 and etc.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Perusal of the records would indicate that on account of non-compliance of office objections, matter has been listed on more than three occasions. In spite of peremptory order passed granting time to pay the costs, neither the cost has been paid nor the office objections have been complied. Even today, there is no representation. This only indicates that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, petition is dismissed.
In the event of an application for recall of the order is filed, Registry is directed to list the said application, only on receipt for having deposited the cost being enclosed.
Sd/- JUDGE SB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Kitty @ Krishne Gowda vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar