IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA W.P.NOS.27034-27038/2010 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. K.S. GIRIDHAR S/O. K.L. SWAMY AGED 43 YEARS NO.54, KANNAYAKANA AGRAHARA ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHACHARI, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 009.
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER B.D.A., BANASHANKARI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE.
4. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020.
5. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER B.D.A., T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE—560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.S. MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADV. FOR R3 TO R5) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE PETITIONER TO THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 192(2) OF K.L.R. ACT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS AS PER ANNEXURE-H.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner would submit that according to the instructions of his client these petitions do not survive for consideration. His submission is placed on record.
2. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as it does not survive for consideration.
3. In the meanwhile, the counsel for the petitioner would submit that within one week he will file a memo with the signature of the petitioner, which is accepted.
Sd/- JUDGE *alb/-.