Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri K Rangaswamy vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.50899/2019(S-KSAT) BETWEEN SRI. K. RANGASWAMY S/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 4 MONTHS (RETIREMENT 31-05-2020) WORKING AS RANGE FOREST OFFICER ANEKAL TERRITORIAL RANGE, ANEKAL BENGALURU URBAN DIVISION BENGALURU DISTRICT RESIDENT OF C/O MALLESHARADHYA MALLESHWARA NILAYA, GOKUL EXTN., PUMPHOUSE ROAD ANEKAL -562 106 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI V.R.SARATHY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND CHIEF OF FOREST FORCE ARANYA BHAVAN, 18TH CROSS MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003 3. S.R. KRISHNA MAJOR WORKING AS RANGE FOREST OFFICER GOWRIBIDANUR RANGE CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAVID HUSSAIN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 SMT.SHILPA S GOGI, HCGP FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO.5807/2019 DATED 23.09.2019 (ANNEXURE-A) IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO DISPOSING OF THE APPLICANT KEEPING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF TRANSFER IN ABEYANCE IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER AND R3 UNTIL POSTING ORDER IS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND FURTHER QUASH THE IMPUGNED TRANSFER ORDER VIDE ORDER BEARING NO.183/2019-20 DATED 19.09.2019 (ANNEXURE-A4 IN APPLICATION) IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO POSTING OF R3 IN THE PLACE OF THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO.26 IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, SATYANARAYANA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
The memo is taken on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE TL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri K Rangaswamy vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 November, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana
  • Sachin Shankar Magadum