IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.32590-32591/2018 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI K.R. SURESH KUMAR S/O. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT ANJANI EXTENSION, CHINTAMANI TOWN, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, PIN CODE – 562 101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI KALYAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. VINODHA W/O. LATE V. VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 2. KUMARI LALITHA D/O. LATE VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, 3. KUMARI NAYANA D/O. LATE VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, 4. KUMARI ARCHANA D/O. LATE VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, 5. MASTER LAKSHMIPATHI S/O. LATE VEERAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, 6. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O. VENKATARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.38, BEHIND BOOTHAPPA TEMPLE, NAGADEVANAHALLI, UNIVERSITY POST BENGALURU – 560 056.
RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 5 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY MOTHER RESPONDNET NO.1.
7. SRI BASAVANTHARAJ S/O. RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT MUMMI GHAT, DHARWAD TOWN, DHARWAD – 580 001. ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.05.2018 ON I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 26 AND 29, AND APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 37 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC IN EX. PET NO.1993/2017 PASSED BY THE VIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXXIII ACMM AT BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOW THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 26 AND 29 AND APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 37 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R These writ petitions are filed against the order dated 11/05/2018, on I.A. filed under Order XXI Rules 26 and 29 and another I.A. filed under Order XXI Rule 37 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in Ex.P.No.1993/2017 on the file of VIII Additional Small Causes Judge and XXXIII ACMM at Bengaluru [‘Trial Court’ for short].
2. It is discerned that the said Ex.P.No.1993/2017 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petitions stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*