IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.17022/2017 (S-DIS) BETWEEN:
SRI K R MAHESH, S/O K. G. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WAS WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER, NO.5B, ZONAL OFFICE, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JLB ROAD, MYSORE 570 004. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ADITHYA R. CHAKRAGIRI, ADV. FOR SRI M. S. BHAGWAT, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JLB ROAD, MYSORE 570 004. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R1, SRI T. P. VIVEKANANDA, ADV. FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 1.4.2017 AT ANNEX-A; QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 1.4.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 AT ANNEX-A AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The petitioner has challenged the suspension order dated 1.4.2014, before this Court. However, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that by order dated 27.11.2017, the petitioner has been reinstated in service. Therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has not been challenged by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE MD