IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.17658 OF 2018 (KLR - RES) AND WRIT PETITION NO.18326 OF 2018 BETWEEN:
1. SRI.K.NAGARAJU, S/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGE 60 YEARS, 2. SRI.SHIVARAJU, S/O LATE SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT KETHIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. L.RAJANNA, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 571 511.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 23.10.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE – E AND TO GRANT THE RELIEF, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THE SAID REPRESENTATION AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed a Memo enclosing endorsement dated 05/30.09.2018 issued by 2nd respondent to the petitioners, whereunder representation of petitioners dated 23.10.2017 Annexure ‘E’ has been considered and rejected. Since in the present petitions, petitioner are seeking for a writ of mandamus being issued to 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 23.10.2017 Annexure ‘E’ and same having already been considered and rejected by endorsement referred to hereinabove, nothing further survives for consideration in these writ petitions.
Placing the said Memo on record, writ petitions stand disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the endorsement dated 05/30.09.2018.
SD/- JUDGE bkp