IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.4810/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI.K.M.RAJENDRAN S/O LATE M KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT No.3, 1ST MAIN C.K.C.GARDEN BENGALURU-560 027 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI.K.JEEVAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. LATE GULSHAN KUMAR SODHI BY HIS L.R., SMT.SUMAN SODHI W/O LATE GULSHAN KUMAR SODHI AGED 47 YEARS R/AT No.51-5, MODEL TOWN HISAR-125 001, HARYANA STATE 2. LATE KAMALA RANI K SODHI (DIED) 3. SRI.KAILASHCHANDRA SODHI S/O.KASTHURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT No.302, PROMENADE PLACE PROMENADE ROAD BENGALURU-560 062 4. SMT.LATHA SALHOTRA W/O.SRI.NANDAKISHORE SALHOTRA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/ AT GROUND FLOOR SHEETAL PARK BUILDING CHANDAVARKAR LANE BORIVAL (WEST), MUMBAI-92 5. SMT.SHAMA DHAWAN S/O.SRI.LALPAT DHAWAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT No.307, 3RD FLOOR ABHINAV CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY BUILDING BHARUCHA ROAD, DALISAR DISTRICT-THANA, MUMBAI 6. NARENDRA SODHI S/O LATE KASTURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT No.301, 3RD FLOOR AKIL TOWER RATANNAGAR DALISAR EAST, DISTRICT-THANA MUMBAI 7. JAGADISHKUMAR SODHI S/O LATE KASTURILAL NIHALCHAND SODHI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT No.103/5, HARISMRUTHI 8TH ROAD DOULATNAGAR, BORIVALI (EAST) MUMBAI-66 8. SMT.KANOTRA W/O.ASHWINI KANOTRA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT.ASHOK VIHAR, NEW DELHI C/O LATE KAMALA RANI SODHI No.103, HARISMRUTHI 8TH ROAD DOULATNAGAR, BORIVALI-(EAST) MUMBAI-66 9. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER PODIUM BLOCK BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21/06/2017 PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.22766/2015.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant is absent.
This intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 21.06.2017 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22766/2015 (GM-CPC) in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. In view of the law laid down by a seven Judge Bench of this Court in Tammanna & Ors. vs. Miss Renuka & Ors. [ILR 2009 KAR 1207], this writ appeal is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Yn.
Sd/- JUDGE