Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Sri K M Patel vs The Asst Secretary Licensing Officer

High Court Of Telangana|07 August, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 19106 of 2002 Date: 07.08.2014 Between:
Sri K.M. Patel … Petitioner And The Asst. Secretary (Licensing Officer), Regional Transport Authority (Central Zone), Hyderabad.
… Respondent This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 19106 of 2002 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 24.09.2002 passed under Section 8 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act and Section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Going by the fact narrated and recorded in the impugned order passed by the Regional Transport Officer, RTA, Hyderabad (CZ), it appears that the petitioner is having vehicle bearing No.AP 09V 5051 and is plying the same on the strength of the temporary permits by paying prorate taxes. The tax sought to be levied pertains to stage carriage. It is settled law that if the law does not authorize to charge any tax under any description, it cannot be levied either directly or indirectly. According to us, this is sought to be done in indirect way. Almost an identical issue was dealt with by a Larger Bench of this Court in the case o f L. Royal Reddy and others vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
[1]
and others .
In paragraph 15 of the report it is stated the legal position as follows:
“Section 3 of the A.P. Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1963 is the charging section, which provides for levy of tax on motor vehicles in the following manner:
3(1): The Government may by notification from time to time, direct that tax shall be levied on every Motor Vehicle used or kept for use, in a Public Place in the State;
3(2): The notification issued under sub-section (1) shall specify the class of motor vehicles on which, the rates for the periods at which, and the date from which, the tax shall be levied:
Provided that the rates of tax shall not exceed the maximum specified in Column (2) of the First Schedule in respect of the classes of motor vehicles fitted with pneumatic tyres specified in the corresponding entry in column (1) thereof; and one and a half times the said maximum in respect of such classes of motor vehicles as are fitted with non-pneumatic tyres.
Section 4 of the Act provides that tax has to be paid in advance and thereafter licence has to be granted. Section 5(1)(b) of the Act provides for punishment by way of fine for non-display of the licence on the Motor Vehicle. Section 6 of the Act provides for penalty for failure to pay the tax. Section 8 of the Act provides for seizure and detention of the Motor Vehicles in case of non-payment of tax. Section 9 of the Act provides for exemption, reduction or other modification of tax. Section 17 of the Act empowers the Government to amend the schedules to the Act.”
We respectfully follow the aforesaid view of the majority of the Judges of the Larger Bench. Therefore, we pass this order.
The writ petition is accordingly allowed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 07.08.2014 ES
[1] 2004 (2) ALD 225 (LB)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri K M Patel vs The Asst Secretary Licensing Officer

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
07 August, 2014
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar
  • Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta