IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.4421-26 OF 2015 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI K.M. KRISHNEGOWDA S/O LATE MOOTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT T. BALLEKERE KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
2. SRI M.S. BORALINGAIAH S/O LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS MOORAMGERE KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
3. SRI RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE MOOGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT ABALAVADI KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
4. SRI H.C. RAJU S/O CHELUBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT HURUGALAVADI KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
5. SRI C.S. JAGADISH S/O SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI KELAGHATTA POST KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
6. SRI CHIKKANANJAIAH S/O LAKKEGOWDA NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT ABALAADI, KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAYAKUMAR S PATIL, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRAKANTH H.R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MYSORE SUB DIVISION MYSORE – 577 001.
3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANDYA MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401.
4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANDYA MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401.
5. THE PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATHINA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMAITHA MANDYA MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401.
6. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION OPP TO BMTC BUS STAND SHANTHI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 027.
7. SRI ADARSH SUPERVISOR / ADMINISTRATOR MANDYA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. MANDYA – 571 401.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.C. KAVITHA HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SRI M. KESHAVA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R6; R5 & R7 SERVED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.01.2015 AT ANNEXURE-K ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC., THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned advocate for the petitioners has filed a memo of even date seeking leave of this Court of withdraw these petitions.
2. Memo is placed on record. These petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE nms