IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ WRIT APPEAL NO.6404 OF 2013 (LB - RES) BETWEEN SRI. K.H.NANJAPPA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SON OF K.HONNAPA, RESIDING AT NO.76/2, VALAGARE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI – 560 060, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. … APPELLANT (BY SRI. G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BENGALURU – 560 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, NO.2., METROPOLITAN DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.G. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.2021 OF 2007 DATED 17.07.2013.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH. J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he does not press this writ appeal. However he may be permitted to file a representation to the respondents, seeking retention of the property. That the respondents may be directed to consider the representation in a manner known to law.
2. In view of the submissions made, the writ appeal is disposed off. The Appellant is always at liberty to make a representation to the Respondents. It is needless to state that the respondents would consider the same in a manner known to law.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE Srl.