IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.8259 OF 2019 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN:
SRI JAGADISH S/O.NARSIMURTHY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT KOLURU VILLAGE TAVAREKERE HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 112 … PETITIONER (BY SRI SHIVAYOGESHA SHIVAYOGIMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPT. OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BENGALURU DISTRICT K.G.ROAD BENGALURU-560 009 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MUZARAI WORKS, URBAN ZONE BENGALURU-560 061 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI RANGANATHA SWAMY TEMPLE MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.SHIVA REDDY, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOCATE ONE SHED/SHOP IN THE TEMPLE PREMISES OF SRI RANGANATHASWAMY TEMPLE, MALLESHWARAM BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-K.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri Shivayogesha Shivayogimath, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Sri V.Shiva Reddy, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 16.11.2018 vide Annexure-K.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 16.11.2018 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for the respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE hkh.