IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO. 24856 OF 2018 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN:
SRI. J. MANJUNATH 37 YEARS S/O LATE JAGANATH STATE COUNCIL MEMBER KARNATAKA STATE GOVT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION CUBBON PARK BENGALURU – 01.
(BY SRI. NAGESH S., ADVOCATE) AND :
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SAHAKARA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 01.
2. DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES GOVT OF KARNATAKA, 4TH ZONE, BANGALORE DISTRICT NO 146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 3RD FLOOR, 8TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU – 03.
3. KARNATAKA STATE GOVT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION CUBBON PARK BENGALURU - 01 ... PETITIONER REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY.
4. C. S. SHADAKSHARI PRESIDENT OF SHIMOGGA DIST EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION DIST BRANCH SHIMOGGA.
(BY SRI.V. SHIVAREDDY, HCGP) ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.04.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND DIRECT TO HOLD AN ELECTION TO THE POST OF PRESIDENT AND TREASURER TO THE R-3 ASSOCIATION FOR THE REMAINING PERIOD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Nagesh S., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. V. Shivareddy, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 30.04.2018 vide Annexure-D.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 30.04.2018 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SA