IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.2524 OF 2015 (CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. J.C. SANDEEP REDDY S/O JAYAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO.1, CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 032 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. V. VIJAYA SHEKARA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O HALU HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT AMURTHAHALLI VILLAGE SAHAKARANAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 092 2. SMT. MUNIRAHTNAMMA W/O LATE LAKSHMIAHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.711, 4TH CROSS VIDYA BHARATHI SCHOOL ROAD BHUWANESHWARI NAGAR R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 032 3. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA W/O LATE D. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE KALLAPPA LAYOUT SAHAKARNAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 092 4. SRI. NARAYANAPPA S/O DODDA BATHIAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT GIVINDARAJ NAGAR VIJAYANAGARA POST BANGALORE-560 040 5. SRI. D. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE DODDA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE KALLAPPA LAYOUT SAHAKARANGAR POST BANGALORE-560 092 6. SRI. D. KALLAPPA S/O LATE DODDA MUNYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/ATAMURTHAHALLI VILLAGE KALLAPPA LAYOUT SAHAKARANAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 092 7. SRI. MUNI KALLAPPA S/O LATE DODDA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.43, JOGUPALYA BEHIND ESHWARA TEMPLE AMRUTHAHALLI, KALLAPPA LAYOUT SAHAKARANAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 092 8. SMT. MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT GOVIDARAJA NAGAR VIJAYANAGARA POST BANGALORE-560 040 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.P. SOMASHEKHARAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) **** THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43, RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:9.3.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.863/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE 10TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, REJECTING IA NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39, RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the submission of the counsel, the appeal does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the miscellaneous first appeal is dismissed, as the same has become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE SJ