IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.NO.12178/2019 (LB RES) C/W W.P.NO.12179/2019 (LB RES) IN W.P.NO.12178/2019 BETWEEN SRI. IMRAN KHAN S/O MOHIDDIN NAWAS KHAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NELLIHUDIKERE SIDDAPURA-571253 N. KODAGU DISTRICT (BY SRI RANJITH K S, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ, M S BUILDING DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NELLIHUDIKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH ... PETITIONER NELLIHUDIKERE KODAGU DISTRICT-571253.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.A.SUBRAMANI, HCGP FOR R1 & R2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION UNDER FORM NO.3 MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 06.03.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12179/2019 BETWEEN SRI MOHAMMED ALI.A S/O ABDUL SAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT 514, NELLIHUDIKERE SIDDAPURA-571253 N. KODAGU DISTRICT.
(BY SRI RANJITH K S, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NELLIHUDIKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ... PETITIONER NELLIHUDIKERE, KODAGU DISTRICT-571253.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.A.SUBRAMANI, ADV. FOR R1, SRI ISMAIL.M.MUSBA, ADV. FOR R2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION UNDER FORM NO.3 MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATD 06.03.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the relief sought in the writ petitions has been granted and that the applications in Form-3 dated 06.03.2019 produced at Annexure-A have been considered by respondent No.2 and appropriate endorsement/order has been issued way back on 25.04.2019, and hence, he submits that the instant writ petitions have been rendered infructuous.
2. The submission of the learned Counsel for respondent No.2 is placed on record.
3. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the endorsement/order dated 25.04.2019, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the same. In that view, writ petitions are disposed off as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE KK CT-HR