IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR R.F.A.NO.769 OF 2006 BETWEEN:
Sri Hemanna S/o Babanna Aged about 58 years R/at Thanisandra village Krishnarajapura Hobli Bengaluru South Taluk PIN – 560 072 …Appellant (By Sri D.R.Rajashekharappa, Advocate) AND:
1. Sri Narayanappa S/o Muniswamappa Aged about 73 years R/o Thanisandra Krishnarajapura Hobli Bengaluru South Taluk PIN : 560 072 2. Ramesh S/o Babanna Aged about 34 years R/at Thanisandra village Krishnarajapura Hobli Bengaluru South Taluk PIN : 560 072 ... Respondents (By Sri P.V.Chandrashekar, Advocate for R1; Sri H.S.Ramamurthy, Advocate for R2) This RFA is filed under Section 96 read with XLI Rule 1 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2005 passed in O.S.No.5033/1988 on the file of the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, CCH-2, Bengaluru, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER The appellant’s counsel is present. He has filed a memo stating that the appellant is not interested to prosecute further in this appeal and he intends to withdraw the appeal. Memo is placed on record. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Refund 75% of Court Fee to the appellant.
KMV/-
Sd/- JUDGE