IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.4718 OF 2018 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, S/O. LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 15, NARASIMHANA PALYA VILLAGE, KACHANAHALLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK-562 123, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.G. FAYAZ SAB, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, V.V.TOWER, BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-562 112, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK-562 111, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
5. THE TAHASILDAR AND SECRETARY, COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LANDS, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA-562 111, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
6. SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, S/O.LATE GANGAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, NARASIMHANA PALYA VILLAGE, KACHANAHALLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK-562 123, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION/REQUEST LETTER DATED 19.12.2017 SUBMITTED FOR CORRECTION OF MISTAKE/ DISCREPENCIES CREPT IN REVENUE RECORDS SUCH AS MUTATION REGISTER AND RTC, WHEREIN NAME OF THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN IS WRONGLY MENTIONED AS SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, SON OF GANGAHANUMAIAH, INSTEAD OF MENTIONING THE CORRECT NAME OF FATHER OF THE PETITIONER AS SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, SON OF KEMPAIAH, AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus in directing respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.12.2017 vide Annexure-G, which is with reference to correction of mistakes that have crept in the revenue records, namely, mutation register and RTC.
2. Learned AGA, this day, submits that the said work is completed and a copy of the corrected revenue records is furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner. The submission of the learned AGA is placed on record.
3. In the light of the aforesaid factual situation, nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, it is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE Cs/-