IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NO.2899 OF 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI H. THIPPA REDDY SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
1(a) SMT. T. KAMALAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O. LATE H. THIPPA REDDY, ‘SAI SHRUTHI NILAYAM’, SY.NO.23, R.J.GARDEN, 1ST CROSS, CHINNAPPANAHALLI VILAGE, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560037.
1(b) SRI T. MURALIDHARA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. LATE H. THIPPA REDDY.
1(c) SRI T. VIJAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O. LATE H. THIPPA REDDY.
1(d) SRI T. UMASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. LATE H. THIPPA REDDY.
PETITIONERS NO.1(b) TO 1(d) ARE RESIDING AT NO.22, ‘SRI SATHYA SAI NILAYAM’, CHINNAPPANAHALLI VILAGE, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560037.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADV.) AND:
1. SRI L. VENKATARAMANA RAJU AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O. LATE R.L. RAJU.
2. SRI V. RAMACHANDRA RAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. VENKATARAMANA RAJU.
3. SMT. V. JAYASHREE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O. VENKATARAMANA RAJU.
4. SMT. V. GEETHA D/O. VENKATARAMANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
5. SRI V. BADRI NARAYANA S/O. VENKATARAMANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.76, RANGA RAO ROAD, SHANKARAPURAM, BANGALORE-560004.
6. SRI G.V. LAKSHMIKANTHA RAJU S/O. LATE M.G. VASANTHAIAH, MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.9/1, 28TH CROSS, KILARI ROAD, BANGALORE-560053.
(BY SRI S. V. GIRIDHAR, ADV. FOR C/R-1;
... RESPONDENTS SRI G.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADV. FOR R-6;
R-2, 4 AND 5 ARE SERVED, BUT UNREPRESENTED; & NOTICE TO R-3 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 5-9-2014) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 2-1-2014 PASSED ON I.A. NO.13 FILED U/O. 1 RULE 10(2) R/W. SECTION 151 OF THE C.P.C. BY THE PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF IN O.S. NO.3536 OF 2005 PASSED BY THE XLIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE-G BY SETTING ASIDE THE SAME AND ALLOW I.A. NO.13 BY GRANTING THE RELIEFS SOUGHT FOR THEREIN.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Mr. C. Shankar Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioners, has filed a memo for dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- JUDGE kvk