IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.446/2017 BETWEEN:
SRI H.R.REVANASIDAPPA S/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O HARALAHALLI VILLAGE JAVAGAL HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK NOW R/AT MALLESHWARA EXTENSION ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 103 …APPELLANT (BY SRI GIRI K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. CHANAMMA D/O SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 2. MALLIKAPPA S/O CHANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 3. SRI GANGADHARAPPA S/O CHANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HARALAHALLI VILLAGE JAVAGAL HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 322 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:08.09.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.22/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARSIKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:16.03.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.82/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ARASIKERE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant reportedly died about six months back and his legal representatives have not turned up to do the needful. He files memo to that effect.
Recording the memo, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
In view of disposal of the appeal, pending I.As. stood disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-