IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11015 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI H.N. DEVARAJ S/O LATE NARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.39 & 40 KALYANI 13TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH BLOCK NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU-560096. … PETITIONER (BY SRI SUNIL KUMAR P. BANGARI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.N. MADHUSUDHAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. GIRIJA SHIVARAM W/O G. SHIVARAM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.35, 3RD CROSS 2ND MAIN ROAD, ITTAMADU ‘B’ EXTENSION, B.S.K. III STAGE BEHIND TERRACE GARDEN BENGALURU-560065.
2. SRI LOVE MEHTA S/O U.S. MEHTA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT KRISHNA NAIK LANE HOSPITAL ROAD CROSS BENGALURU-560053. … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER IN O.S.NO.336 OF 2014 DATED 19.03.2016 PASSED ON I.A.NO.VI FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 (d) OF THE CPC AS PER ANNEXURE-G AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The writ petition is disposed off as having been withdrawn, to enable the petitioner to file Civil Revision Petition in terms of memo filed.
The Registry is directed to return the impugned order to the petitioner, forthwith, after retaining a copy in the file.
It is needless to mention that the period spent in the prosecution of this petition shall be discounted while computing the period of limitation for filing the Civil Revision Petition/appeal as the case may be.
All contentions of the parties are kept open.
Sd/- JUDGE KPS/-